दिल
61
A.
Q.
35.
You told 2nd Defendant you were going to show him certain documents?
14
54
A.
Yes.
Q
A.
A.
A.
Q.
A.
A & A & A & A &
A.
A.
A.
Q.
A.
Did not 2nd Accused say "I don't want to say anything until solicitor arrives"?
At first he accepted documents shown to him.
I put it to you he said he did not want to have anything to do with them until solicitor arrived?
No.
Did you not say that as 2nd Defendant was denying everything it did not matter if solicitor were there or not?
I do not recollect this.
You showed him C.A. Allotment form before solicitor arrived?
Yes.
And he did not reply at all?
(Refers to notes.)
not?
I put it to you he did reply?
He did.
Yesterday you showed 2 microfilm copies of letters to Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank?
Yes.
PP11 referred I put it to you you did not show that to him
at all?
That is quite untrue. I did show it to him.
Would you agree only copies or originals of bank drafts showed him were in connection with Manchester?
The only original drafts I showed him were connected with Winchester and not Manchester.
Q.
What you said yesterday was a mistake?
62
A.
Yesterday I think I was handed originals.
I showed
Mr. Thompson copies. Counsel handed me the originals. As far as Hang Seng Bank drafts are concerned 25/7/72 the ones which appeared to refer to Winchester and those which appeared to refer to Manchester are in one bundle.
y
you showed him only
Q•
Don't you think you made a mistake
one letter instead of two?
A.
No.
Page 45Page 46
55
63