9.
28
overt acts. Feither I nor my friend said it was such a situation.
Objection is no conspiracy charge at all. Quashed if leid. Apply for
separate trials.
Can't concern greater prejulice than an attempt to prove in
joint charges. Defendant has told a lie on some other occasions by use of a piece of legerdermain requiring a defendant to incriminate himself.
Adjourned 15 minutes to real summary of evidence.
Sgt. (B.L. Jones ) District Judge
Mr. Hampton:
14
1:
2.
Re sumy. 2 startling inadequacies.
Fact none of names of witnèsses supplied.
Singular brevity of summary.
Re 1. I imagine Crown have obvious reasons for suppressing
names of witnesses. Defence have equally obvious and much more cogent
reason for requiring a large proportion of witnesses appear to be
underworld characters. Defence are entitled to be told whether any of
them have criminal records, names or alios end details of records when,
what and where so defence has. Obtain if so wish copies of notes of proceedings re these. Defence might wish to interview them. No property in a witness. Why any pressure being brought on witness. Question of
dates view Your Honour takes.
2 applications before Court and present one which is for disclosure to defence of names and present addresses of witnesses.
Mr. Gunston:
witnesses.
First criminal case when Crown has refused to supply a list of
Interference of witness where ovidence of this.
I want to see some of witnesses. Will take time.
spent months investigating over a period of time.
Depositions in United Kingdom.
Sentence increased. Pavcedure still samo,
Brief summary. Ample time to prepare our case. Question dates depend on decision, particulars.
I.C.A.C.
Interest of
justice.
28