6-5
11
(B) LAW Ming-tak was prepared to sacrifice his employee in order to extricate himself and his people out of their difficulties. He was prepared to pay, and it was he who paid LEUNG the $10,000 through LAU Cheong- wah. There is also evidence, which is probably true, that he gave LAU Cheong-wah a substantial sum of money to achieve his purpose.
(C) LAU Cheong-wah was anxious to arrest LEUNG because the Police at the time were unable to find him, and LEUNG's arrest by LAU would be beneficial to his career. He was willing to help LAW Ming-tak probably for the pecuniary benefits he had received. It will be noted that at all material times, LEUNG's family, CHAN Loi-fat and LLE Chi-lung were the only persons who knew of LEUNG's whereabouts.
(D) CHAN Loi-fat was also instrumental in bringing about LUNG's arrest, and he helped to persuade LEUNG to come out of hiding. For his trouble he received a sum of $5,000 from the Police as informer's fee. CHAN did not betray LEUNG to the Police. No doubt, obeying a code of honour amongst fellow triad members, he appealed to his friend to emerge from hiding voluntarily.
Various
At the conclusion of the meeting at the Harbour Hotel, the venue of LEUNG Wing-sang's arrest was discussed. alternatives having been considered, Hunghom was chosen. Then followed a bizarre but nevertheless true incident. LAU Cheong-wah, Sergeant YIP Yin, Detective Constable 6522 (now Sergeant) WAN Chi and Detective Divisional Inspector MOK Sau-tim together with CHAN Loi-fat and LEUNG, set out in two cars to go a place outside the Lux Theatre, Bulkeley Street, Hunghom and there effected a fictitious arrest. This was just after midnight on 31st July, 1973. For reasons which have not been made clear, YICK Chung allowed himself to be arrested later the same night at Cheungsha Street. The fictitious arrest of LEUNG in