A
C
B
C
D
E
G
H
I
K
M
N
O
P
Q
R
T
-549
PEC/21/11
did not indicate anyone for them to arrest. The 2nd accused did not S. CHAI Loi-lat or P... O in the restaurant. The 2nd accused said. he made no note of the visit to the bathhouse and the Mathan
starmant in his notebook as they did not find anybod and it was therefore not important. fro there they went to LIC's house arriving ture at about 2.50 pele The 2nd accused saw the parents and brothers and sisters of KUNG and searched the furniture and clothing but found nothing. The 2nd accused did not see P.. 6 or CIA! Loi-fat et name's house. After that they wont back to the Manchai Police Station. The 2nd accused said that on a subsequent occasion ho vent to TG's house again to take a statement from his parents. That Ovening MJMG's girlfriend came to the police station asking to sou WUNC And asked the 2nd accused for permission to have coffee with LG next door in the Harbour Hotel. The 2nd accused agreed. He said he did not handcuff LUNG vhen they went to the Habour Hotel because 0,0. 7027 was holding on to LEUNG with locked fingers. At the hotel they did not see P.M. C nor CH Loi-fat. The 2nd accused testified that on no other occasion did he take LEUNG to the Harbour batcl. He said he sax CHAN Loi-fat again on & subsequent date in Ull: Tai Lɔi Rooteurent when the let accusot paid CHAN 15,000 information money. it is not in dispute that the let and 2nd accused together with D/Sgt. MT Chi and other police officers want to liacau on the 3rd August, returning on the 6th August, 1973. The 2nd accused said. Lo had nothing to do with the decision to release YIK Chung and he thought that the 1st accused would have had nothing to do with that decision because as junior officers they could not shouldor such responsibility. Me and accused said that on the 18th/19th July, 1973 he booked into the Harbour Hotel for one or two days because his work relating to this case (which I took to mean the Cactus incident) nad Jado bin very tired. 3. leid for the Crown asked him, "But if it was the 16th July, it was before the Cactus incident?" The 2nd accused replied, "Yes." He admitted that at the Comission of Juquiry he said that I Ching was a famous member of the 14K. The 2nd accueɔrd agreed that no one was arrested in connection with the Cactus Apartment House after the 31st July. He was asked whether he Imey that in March of this year a special squad vas formed by the police to investigate the Cactus case and the 2nd accused said that he had read this frou newspapers and that a few persons had boen arrested. His attention was draim to the time of Vik Chung's arrest as stated in the Langkok Police Sation report book which. vas 01.33 hours on the 31st July, which was one minute before TRUNG is purported to have finished his statement b the 2nd accused and the D.D.1. in the Bue on Folice Station. The 2nd accused said that the Report to the Hongkok Folice Station was made by 2/3gt. VAH Chi to the duty officer ald ho did not know whether WAN Chi's watch was Cast en slow. He said it was the duty officer who recorded the time as 01.50 hours as the time of the commencement of the recording in Ao report book. The 2nd accused said he did not take any antecedent statement iron MANG on the morning of the 31st July.
The 2nd accused admitted that it was only in this court and for the very first time that he admitted takin, IRUNG to a bab Lonse and to the lablan lestaurent and in the evening to the Harbour Hotel. He said it was possible that he forgot to mention these matters to the Commission of Sucuiry although he agreed that le vas closely questioned about that day in the Commission of Inquiry.
M
N
P
0
R
S
T
U
S.C. 224
V