2.

of manslaughter and this is so however great the degree of intoxication.

On the other hand, if the accused was intoxicated and if he was still,

whilst intoxicated, able to form the specific intent to kill or to cause

serious injury, and if he did form such an intention, then he would in

spite of his intoxication be guilty of murder. By their conviction, it

is an inevitable conclusion that the jury must have rejected all those

defences.

The two accused were soldiers. Both were 19 years of age at

the time of the crime. The deceased was a middle-aged man and a wine

The murder took place outside the Sek Kong Army

maker by occupation.

Camp in Kam Tin Main Road.

The two accused had been drinking heavily since the afternoon

of the 17th February 1976. At about 5:30 a.m. on the morning of the

18th, the two accused were seen chasing after three Chinese men, one of

whom was injured in the head. Then the two accused, each armed with a

wooden pole, approached yet another Chinese man and demanded to know

the time. The next thing that happened was the assault upon the deceased,

who happened to be walking in the vicinity. The two accused set upon

the deceased and chased after him. Then they clubbed him until he fell

into a ditch. Even after the deceased had fallen, the beating continued.

An onlooker ran up to the two accused and tried to stop them but failed.

Eventually they stopped the beating and went away laughing.

The

deceased died of a brain injury. Apart from the incidents already

mentioned, the two accused also rán after a public light bus and one of

them threw a wooden stick into the vehicle.

unprovoked.

The attack upon the deceased was entirely unexpected and

He was alone, unarmed and quite unable to defend himself.

Share This Page