Toets
1.3.Box 170
Church Stre; Station New York, N.4.10007
le Honor: ble Attorney-General Hongkong, The British Colony.
Dear Sir:
i
November 14th, 1977
As i am a human being, believe that I am entitle to a lawful trial before I could be declared "guilty"
Hon kong Government is made of Government Officers, by the Government Officers and for the overnment officers. Your letter to me says that your job is rendering service to Hongkong Govern ment and not for the people. It just accidentally happens that I am an education officer. Although I am Education Officer of the lowest echelon, nevertheless, I am part of the Hongkong Gove rnment. without the government officers, Hongkon Gove nment would be an empty house. As a fourkong Government officer, I therefore believe sincerely that am entitled to your service in
i the performanence of your duties to protect and preserve the justice and burean rights which have been savagely violated by the unethical and the injudicious conduct of a greedy and corrupt magistrate who has willfully and disgracefully abusel the sacred power and authority. in conspiracy with the prosecution witness to make the Hongkong magistrate Court as his privete family court which has become his most beautiful instrument to wake oney.
This is not a case of ordinary human error. It is a case of seriouslly moral turpitude of the magistrate himself in blatant violation of the most important human rights, while the victim has no fault of his o^N As part of the Hongkong Government itself, i respec trully beg you to ask the District Court of Victoria to declare this illegal jute ent will and void with a lawful trial on the grounds of your e:Leemed advice: (1) Your
cont
•
0
ereas
•
to try
106 letter advises met " ujar
4
old dis qualify i
rom trying a case where he has bad revious
f the parties to the procee ix magistrate Lu Rim-ching has clandestingly golla! my C236 19 2 Cking horse for conspiracy and extortion. (2) Your same letter arises me: "It is illegal for any witness
to demand
rom any party to any court procedings.. whereas na isirate lo Hing-shing ordered me in the open court to go out with the prosecution witness l'am ang to Aongso (bargain for ibel.
(3) Your sa. ·
10 Sumrak
the
to
me
?
H
advises me: "It would be prore · for a judge iminal case that the forent: it should speak whereas agistrato his sting ordered witness outside the courtroom to loneso.
10
*
Aisure you
(4) Your benenir, 1971 letter advises me:
201 that it onl! entirely wrong for a judge to convict and sent ence a defen het uithout giving him an opportunity of putting forwardi
Your May 1st, 1972 letter advis S me: "If the or in demands money from the defendant eleging that he can intongede with the trial judes, the dendars should report the
or to the court bul Marist the Lo forbade me to
and suddenly declared an illegal judgment of ma without trial. lour a i. e dos. nou agree
This is why respectfully beg
in your
put up by
guilty
with agistrate
1
you tɔ mate good your advice in y ur deed as well as word. Yours ost respectfully
Liomas P.M.TUNG
MTung