iv

Household Size:

Only 7 respondents lived on their own, only 20 respondents in fact

lived with less than 3 other people. The average number of

persons per household was 6. Fifteen of the respondents were the

sole breadwinner in the household and a further 30 respondents

were one of two breadwinners. The average number of wage-earners

per household was 3 indicating that the majority of respondents

shared the breadwinning role with more than one other person.

Places Respondents spent Childhood and Youth:

An overwhelmingly large number of respondents (83) had in fact

grown up in Hong Kong or Kowloon. If the 2 respondents who grew up

in the New Territories are added in, 85 of sample are Hong Kong

bred. Only 14 came from mainland China (mainly Canton). This

origin ties in obviously with the sample's young age, average age

in fact was 291 years. The sample members do not on the whole

therefore appear to have been refugees.

Father/Male Guardians' Occupation:

1

The majority of the sample here had urban, working class fathers,

etc. Again respondents don't appear to be refugee peasants; only

4 came from an ordinary rural background. However, a substantial

minority of the sample, 40, appear to have experienced downward

social mobility in relation to their fathers.

(ii) Job Characteristics of the respondents.

The respondents were employed in the Garments, Textiles, Plastics,

Miscellaneous Metals and Electrics and Electronics industries

with the largest group being employed in the first. All of the

firms were owned locally, two thirds by Cantonese speaking

proprietors and the remaining third by Shanghainese speaking

proprietors. The large majority of the firms were located in the

Kowloon and New Kowloon area with a few being located in the

New Territories. The size of firm the respondents worked for was

controlled for in the survey design and 50 respondents were

selected from small firms and 50 from large firms. All of the

small firms employed 30 or less employees while the number of the

large firms' employees most frequently fell into 1,000 to 1,999

category, while the over 2,000 category had the second highest

frequency here. Comparison of the size of the firms sampled

Share This Page