2, AN
32
Yes.
R
IN
$.51
Mr Hurst
2 / MAY 1977.
HONG KONG:
1.
Ipe register
42/0 31/8/71
ل لاحبة
LAG 011/393/1 Reference....
O Re way to Mr Duffy HK OG D
рево
2G
for action on part © Re Bu 31 Chequiti
APPLICATION OF ILO CONVENTIONS
14KK 2116207
The Governor's letter of May confirms our presentiment that the legislative programme would continue to slip back. The legislation relating to Conventions 17, 42 and 90. only recently scheduled for the third quarter of the year, is now put back to the fourth and there is no guarantee that it will in fact all be achieved by the end of December. What
Mod
25/9
I find surprising is that Hong Kong should have committed themselves to a programme of improved declarations without having first established the full legislative implications.
347 2.
FLAG`A`-
FLAG 'B'
As Mr Duffy points out, it is evident that the Governor has taken aboard the sense of urgency conveyed in Lord Goronwy- Roberts' letter of 7 April. The question is whether there is anything to be gained by applying further pressure from London at this stage. This is primarily for Hong Kong Department's judgement but on the basis of the Governor's letter I doubt it. Also I am not aware of any grounds on which we might query Hong Kong's assessment of the legislative and other measures which are needed in order to give effect to the proposed improved declarations. In relation to Conventions 17 and 12, for example, it would .seem that the Convention cannot be said to be effectively applied until the special fund (0.17) and insurance pool (C.42)
are established and operational.
3. HKD should be aware that if the legislation etc. relating to Conventions 17 and 42 is not completed this year it will mean that of the six Conventions listed on page 2 of Lord Goronwy- Roberts' letter of 7 April only four can be the subject of improved declarations in 1977, anl, of these, two will have slipped from 1976.
4. We spoke of the possibility that one or more of the nine Conventions listed as possibles for 1978 onward might be brought forward. (See Appendix III to Sir D Roberts' letter of 4 January). Of these, three (Nos. 10, 58 and 59) are concerned with minimum age restrictions and are presumably linked to the raising of the school-leaving age (due in 1987). Trong Kong have already warned that improvonents on No. 32 are unlikely before. 1978 and that implementation of the necessary legislation "will depend on our ability to process other labour legislation already in the pipeline". Current progress with legislation does not give much ground for hope here. Conventions 69 and 74 are endorsed "may be improved in 1978", but, being concerned with ships' cooks and the certification of able Seamen, neither is of much significance for Hong Kong labour conditions. Nos. 86 and 97 are shown as "being examined", and we have no further indication of the present position. It might just be worthe: asking whether there is any chance of progress on these this year.
5. At the same time I agree with Mr Duffy that it is important to keep the rate of progress on the Conventions already scheduled under review and subject to any further reports received in the meantime I think HKD should check the position with Hong Kong again not later than, say, early deptember.
C.Ri
Zude
Para of hord G. Ri helley of 7 April to the
Saremur asked for a progwers deport by
of octider. iur. ?||>
CODE 18 - 77
239.
The befinde
R Vileceka