Government from the date of his surrender until the date of grant whilst in the

meantime the Government is making full use of the surrendered lot and may be

deriving income therefrom to the exclusion of the owner.

9.

When the landowner uses "Letter B Entitlement" to exchange for land

granted by the Crown, and agrees to pay to the Government a premium for that

land, the landowner does this on the basis of the law applicable at that time.

The development of land under a "Letter B" Exchange is governed by the provisions

of the Building (Planning) Regulations which set out the permitted density of

development in terms of site coverage and plot ratio. "Plot ratio" is the ratio

of the total floor area of the building as against the total area of the land.

In June, 1975 the Government unilaterally introduced the policy

whereby, for land granted in redemption of "Letter 3" rights, the permitted

density of such land was substantially cut down. In recognition of this unfairness

the Government offered owners a token reduction of the premium charged for the

exchange. The Heung Yee Kuk considers that such a policy ought not to be introduced

without consultation with it and without legislative amendment, and should have no

10.

retrospective application.

11.

The alternative to "Letter B" Entitlement is cash compensation for land

resumed under the Crown Land Resumption Ordinance, Cap 124. This is oppressive of

the inhabitants. The development of the New Territories caused land prices to

rise. Agricultural land near a development usually becomes unsuitable for

agriculture (see paragraph II 3(i) above). The Crown relies on legislation to

impose a wholly arbitrary sum for cash compensation which is far below the true

market value. This arbitrary sum is the capital value which the Crown determines

as that of land used only for agriculture (when it can no longer be so used), with

its expectancy or probability or permission to modify its use being disregarded.

In truth, the market value of the land consists of many components including the

economic and political stability of the New Territories. By taking a fixed and

arbitrary agricultural value, the Government had been compensating the inhabitants

in the New Territories for land resumed at a figure not exceeding $10.00 per sq.

ft. up to the end of March 1977 when the true market value was substantially more.

- 9 -

Share This Page