It stands to reason that the Hong Kong Government should prove to the world at large and the public in Hong Kong that it is a responsible administration by taking steps to eliminate injustice in the above case and looking after the well-being of the victim who is aggrieved by the unjust decision of crocked judges being civil servant s.
If judges of law were permitted to make ir responsible decisions against public interest and to conspire with defence lawyers in perverting the course of justice as a result of their taking bribes, it will be the end of the rule of law and human civilization in Hong Kong.
If criminals convicted by a judge of integrity were subsequently set free by crooked judges on a fallacious argument, the judicature as a whole should be held responsible for the crime situation in Hong Kong,
Though the judicature is an independent machinery, it bes not mean that judges of law could abuse their judi cial powers or to avail themselves of the previleges which courts of law enjoy to serve their own interest, nor does it imply that they are exempted from the operation of the Pryention of Bribery Ordinance, of the laws of Hong Kong
Please note that I am not making "allegations". My complaints and grievances are supported by official records of the Hong Kong Government, to which you have access,
If you compare what I said with the records of the courts, the legal department, the ICAC and the police, you will form the opinion that my reports are soundly based and coincide with facts.
Any person with average intelligence who examines the official records relating to the above case will readily reach the conclusion that there has been graft in the "appeal" phrase of the relevant legal proceedings,
Thanking you for your kind attention, I remain with good wishes,
Yours respectfull
Pun Ting Chau Victim & Principal Crown Witness
PS. Your letter dd, 18th Feb. 1974 refers to the above case.
The main reasons why Tin Sin Kuk swindlers in Hong Kong managed to cause the conviction against the 3 defendants in the above case set aside at any cost and by all means, including bribery, is that it poses a serious threat to their livelihood and their illegal activities as such have been brought to a standstill for more than half a year following arrest of the defendants and prosecution of their offences in court.
The above case is a battle between law enforcement officers of integrity and Tin Sin Kuk swindlers as a whole in Hong Kong. If it were lost, the outcome would be detrimental to the community at large.
In Hong Kong, Tin Sin Kuk swindles are a multi-millions dollar(thirty millions each year) racket; swindlers can afford to raise a substantial sum of money for payment over to crooked judges and lawyers as reward for their conspiring to obstruct the course of justice
This is the background against which a very strong case for the Crown has been upset and
and
upheld the appeal lodged by the convicted swindlers, turning "blind-eye" to the evidence and exhibits on which their conviction was originally based.