Q.
A.
Q.
A.
Q.
What was it that you didn't want to be published that might have
affected your credibility?
Well, details of the 18 years corruption; but I would have had to tell
you in the witness-box.
So that can't be the matter you were trying to prevent .... the reason
why you were trying to prevent publication?
No.
It was giving you a lot of ammunition.
Quite. I appreciate that. Was that the reason why you tried to stop
the publication?
A.
Of course.
Q.
You wanted to try and mislead me?
A.
Q.
No. If you asked me the right questions, I would have given you the
ansvers.
Better not give me to chance to ask?
A.
If you put it that way, yes.
Q.
A.
And do you think then that you would have been able to put yourself
forward as a different sort of witness to the one which you can now
do so?
No, I would have been perfectly truthful with you. You said I am a
crook for 18 years, I admit it.
You also appeared on BBC?
Q.
A.
Yes.
Q.
Paid for that?
Å.
I am not sure about that actually.
Q.
You have not made enquiries,
A. Yes, I am making enquiries at the moment.
Q.
You stayed at the Hilton, was it?
፡፡
Am I staying at the Hilton, did you say?
Did you stay at the Hilton when you were in London?
I did, yes, at the expense of the BBC.
Two days. They haven't even given me my air fare back yet.
A.
Q.
How many days was that?
A.
Q.
Are you going to instruct a solicitor,
A.
No.
Q.
Did you take some tapes for a book?
A. Tapes for a book, yes ....... where, to Lendon?
6:
Q.
Are you in the process of preparing a book?
A.
It is written.
Q.
A.
I presume you don't want that published before this case?
No.
Q. Your cross-examination may have been a bit more vulnerable than it is now?