SECRET
UK EYES A
to indicate options which could lead to a compromise between the three factors set out in paragraph 6: no signficant savings were found in the estimated cost of the "reduced" garrison
arm
(53 Army teeth/units), though the implications of further cutting the size and cost of the garrison were discussed in general and illustrative terms; the Hong Kong representatives put forward no strong arguments, related to the costings, which in themselves might prompt Ministers to consider any significant
increase in the proposed UK contribution; and the Hong Kong
had no discretion to discuss representatives zkole showed no flexibility on the question of
Hong Kong's contribution. In other discussions, however, with
the Governor, the Financial Secretary and CBF, a number of
points were made which are relevant to these issues/
(a) It was emphasised that the proposal of HMG to reduce
both the UK forces in Hong Kong and the UK's
proportionate contribution to their cost was clearly
being seen by 'unofficial' and public opinion as a
withdrawal by the UK, at least in part, from the
responsibilities for maintaining the security of the
colony which she has accepted in the past.
were made
(b) This apparent withdrawal could reduce deterrence of
internal disturbance and, also, weaken business
confidence and so the economy.
(c) The attitude adopted by HMG was resented the more by
the 'unofficial and the public because HMG was
simultaneously being seen in other areas to impose
policies which were contrary to the wishes of Hong Kong. eg. the death penalty.
SECRET
UK EYES A