G.F. 323

CONFIDENTIAL #B

of those in Government hospitals (see appendix 2). These

differences might impede the smooth working of an integrated

scheme. For instance the scheme would envisage the movement

of a patient for convalescence in a district hospital after

completion of acute treatment in a regional hospital.

However a patient in a regional hospital such as the

Queen Elizabeth, where he is charged $2 a day, would

presumably be reluctant to accept transfer to a district

hospital if the fee were higher.

6.11

The Government considers that ideally Government

and Government-assisted hospitals should provide medical

treatment free to third-class patients, but that all should

be charged a uniform fee for subsistence based on that charged

by Government hospitals but with a remission scheme in case

of need. While this is the goal which the Government considers

desirable, and which logic dictates, it is appreciated that

assisted hospitals have their own traditions and that the

goal may not be easy to achieve in the short term. The

Government has no wish to disturb the charitable instincts

on which these hospitals were founded, and it would be

unfortunate if the contributions received by these hospitals

towards their expenses were to be lost to the community.

Accordingly the Government proposes that the position of

each hospital or group of hospitals should first be examined

and the most appropriate arrangement reached by mutual

agreement.

6.12

If charges were standardised in the way proposed

it would mean that the fee income of some Government-assisted

hospitals would be reduced. This issue would arise immediately

CONFIDENTIAL

/in relation...

機密

Share This Page