4
(b) The Minister has also expressed his anxiety that I should
accept that, leaving aside the question of corruption, the Hongkong Government "were within their contractual right" (in terminating my probationary appointment) "in the way
that they did."
(c)
2/
This condition is totally inadmissible, and I am surprised
that I should have been asked to accept it.
I will under no circumstances agree to waive or restrict,
in any way whatever, my right to have recourse to any legal means of redress open to me should this submission fail to obtain for me the relief to which I feel, and am
advised, that I am entitled.
On the contrary, my complaint is based upon the ground
that the Hongkong Government, in purporting to terminate my empayment in the manner described in this statement, and in the many representations which have preceded it, was guilty of an abusive and fraudulent misuse of the
conditions of my engagement.
My submission is that the facts already on file and now recapitulated herein, amply support this contention.
Since it has quite correctly been pointed out to me
that the Commissioner has power to go only into allegations of corruption, I have avoided in this
submission reference to the administrative aspects of
my complaint.
(d) Further, this statement concentrates upon the principal
· item of direct evidence of my complaint and does not
go into the detail of considerable circumstantial
evidence relevant to the complaint.
а
OVER/..