CONFIDENTIAL

Flag E

Flag C

the case since, apart from the emergency regulations, the law

is consistent with the Convention.

7.

We have considered whether we can explain in Parliament

the specific reasons why the Convention cannot be extended to

Hong Kong. Such explanations have been given by countries

where there were no political reasons for not doing so. But

in the case of Hong Kong, public discussion of the emergency

regulations, of the unwillingness of China to accept deportees,

and of the existence or absence of a threat to the nation,

would certainly affect confidence. This implies that we must

avoid detailed discussion of the point in Parliament.

8. Mr Grieve may go on to claim, in the light of Mr Beard's

case, that whether or not the substantive rights of the individual

are protected in Hong Kong, the absence of a power to petition

the European Commission of Human Rights is itself a deprivation

of rights. The facts of Mr Beard's case are described in the

attached background paper which was prepared for the Prime Minister

in 1969. We should, however, try to a void getting involved in

these personal details in Parliament in the answer to this

general PQ. We are already in correspondence with Mr Grieve,

and Mr Royle promised to contact him again when our current

investigations were complete. On the general point, however,

the right of petition to the European Commission is not an

inevitable result of the extension of the Convention to

For example, the Convention extends,

particular territories.

- 3 -

CONFIDENTIAL

/without

Share This Page