25
Mr Wilford PS My Royle B.
CONFIDENTIAL
to we
7401
Tuen i somi ambiguity bete.
The decisim ad Пидейті
o to mi Pins a 3 appears
Роста
refined
to be the sofs's decision
Hie
Reached between the
which was
A.R.
2 debates.
(131)
Flag A
Flag B
Flag C
Flag D
THE DEATH PENALTY IN HONG KONG
...
PIA
A
1 The draft DOP paper submitted with my minute of 18 June
contains the sentence: "But in April this year (the Governor)
decided in a particular case that this was no longer possible,
this particular decision happened to come immediately before
the debates on the death penalty in general and in Northern
Ireland". This was changed, I think in Mr Royle's office, to
read: "But this particular decision happened to come between
the debates on the death penalty in general and in respect of
Northern Ireland", and it has appeared in the final DOP paper
in the latter form.
2. In fact the first version is correct. The Governor's
decision was dated 10 April (Hong Kong telegram No 380). The
debate on Mr Taylor's motion was on 11 April (Hansard Col 1332)
and the debate on the Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions)
Bill was on 14 May (Hansard Col 1025).
3. The point does not matter in the context of the DOP
discussion which will be concerned solely with our policy for
the future. I therefore do not think there is any need to
amend the paper itself. But the true sequence of events does
have a bearing on the question whether the Governor knew or
could have been warned of what was happening in Parliament.
/I suggest
CONFIDENTIAL