CONFIDENTIAL
consult his colleagues or some of them.
Despite the
(e)
7.
DOPC's earlier decision not to change the law, a
further paper for the committee will probably be needed
at least for the first specific case, which will set
the pattern.
We will also, as the Governor points out,
need to be sure that the Secretary of State can hold to
this decision. He may well wish for the political
advice of his colleagues on this point.
If the recommendation is to change the law, the depart-
ment will at the same time submit a draft DOPC paper
setting out the facts of the case and of the political
situation. We will do the same if it is decided to
consult Ministers without a recommendation of our own.
The Governor proposes that if Ministers decide that the
law must be changed, we should inform him within five weeks of
receiving his preliminary conclusions (or four weeks if we go
back to him with further comments), so that Executive Council
can be informed before an Order is presented to the Privy
Council. Again I think this is right. It contains the risk
that Unofficial Members of Executive Council might precipitate
a crisis. But on past form a crisis with Hong Kong is more
likely if we do not go through the forms of consultation.
Moreover there is the chance that Executive Council would
accept the logic of the situation and change the law themselves
or recommend a reprieve.
8.
He proposes that Executive Council should have three weeks
4
CONFIDENTIAL
/for