CONFIDENTIAL
(16)
3. In his letter Mr Kidd argues that, because the unions
in Hong Kong are for the most part politically dominated,
poorly supported and badly led, the introduction of compul-
sory recognition cannot be justified at the present time.
For similar reasons he considers that compulsory arbitration
would be inappropriate in Hong Kong. Mr Kidd does say,
however, that the recommendations made by Mr Foggon to the
Hong Kong Government in his report of December 1971 to
introduce some degree of statutory protection for workers
against acts of anti-union discrimination have been accepted
and that the necessary consultations are now taking place.
Mr Foggon's advice on comprehensive industrial relations
legislation to replace the Illegal Strikes and Lock-outs
Ordinance has also been accepted in principle.
4.
The Hong Kong Government have been tardy in reacting to
the recommendations contained in Mr Foggon's report. But I
agree with their view that Mr Jenkins' proposals are too far
reaching for Hong Kong at the present time. We should, however,
continue to press Hong Kong to ensure that Mr Foggon's more
modest proposals are implemented without any further untoward
delay.
5. Mr Royle promised in his letter of 2 April to let Mr Tilney
have a copy of his substantive reply to Mr Jenkins.
6.
I attach a draft letter to Mr Jenkins, which has been
CONFIDENTIAL
/prepared