SECRET

without the amendment being retrospective in form. This was

important. Sir M MacLehose said he would be delighted if this

could be done. It would improve relations more than anything

else. But if Mr Godber had left the UK by the time the Act was

amended, the row would be worse than ever. Could it be amended

quietly? Mr Rushford thought that, if Mr Godber did abscond to,

say, France, it would be very difficult to get him back.

He was

on the stop list, but this could be evaded. Sir M MacLehose

asked whether an Order in Council could be made and Mr Godber

arrested simultaneously. Fr Rushford said that both Houses of

Parliament would have to approve the Order, which would then go

to The Queen. We could hurry the process, but the dangers of

would remain

alerting Mr Godber. Mr Royle asked whether it would be possible

to arrest Mr Godber on the day the Order was tabled. Mr Rushford

said this would be difficult.

to take advice on the matter.

Sir M MacLehose said he would like

So far as he knew, there was still

no evidence to support extraditable charges against Mr Godber.

Mr Royle pointed out that it would not in any case be possible to

change the Fugitive Offenders Act before the House reassembled.

8. Mr Royle then asked what was the latest news on the possible

appointment of hir Prendergast to the Anti-Corruption Office.

Sir M MacLehose said that he wanted to get him there soon, but was

not sure about the timing. Corruption in Hong Kong must be cut

down and Mr Prendergast was the best man for the job. The need

was to track down corruption in high places, which was clearly

SECRET

/more

Share This Page