CONFIDENTIAL
MR WILFORD
FORD
AN IDENTITY FOR THE INHABITANTS OF HONG KONG
1.
I suspect that there may be more substantial objection to pursuing Lord Butler's suggestion that we should create class called "Chinese Citizens of Hong Kong". The sort of
objections I have in mind are:-
(a)
Political
The phrase quoted by Lord Butler seems to me to imply the creation of a Third China. Would not Peking
see it that way?
(b) Legal
Does not the term "Citizen" have a special
significance in law viz: it is associated with independence. The constitutions of the West Indian Associated States
for instance contain provision that though the chapter dealing with Citizenship shall not come into effect until after the Association between the States and Britain have become independent. It is my impression that it was because of this legal point we were driven to devise the unglamorous term "belonger" to meet the position of persons in a Dependent Territóry who wanted a closer association with that territory than the status of British subject implied. Mr Rushford can confirm this. In other words I think I agree with your conclusion but I believe the objections which indeed may be implicit in paragraph 3 of Mr Laird's submission need, if they do have validity, to be brought out more clearly. Can you reconsider?
2.
15 May 1972
Copy to:
Mr Laird Mr Rushford
(L Monson)
Mh Radfar
деобул
I had be graful for
your
vicios
pora.
ра
1(6)
CONFIDENTIAL alm. lava
тых