Mu Malleit.
Reference
14
12
113
2.
We spoke.
A
too
reply to To has gone saying that we a gore
the Comite proposed
therefore
have
examination of
in paragraph
with
6. thereof. We
a month in which to complete our
the
revised Bill at fe, (which is the version, that has been published in Hong Kong). By the end of that porod it is to be hoped that we shall knows what form the UK legislation
take.
8
will
being chealt with
3. The P.Q. referred to at has beening
Separately.
I am accordingly returning these files to you,
H.
with my minute of
12/7 to enable you
complete upur
examination of
the
Bile.
',
Perhaps
you
would include in
excenciation
your
the pointer raised in the letter at (7) to which
for shall have to reply.
6. See also the Bulletin at (11), wined by the
Hong Kay Gast. Information Senices by way of explanation of certain -provisions of
P.S. You may
20.7.71
be interested to su
unaware
هستام
Bilc.
© d® on
ник, 18/34
1
When
drafted para 4
of which I
was
of since there has been no revision of the
Those papers
laws of Hong Kong
Suice 1969.
• DD 737719 557664 500M 2/71 GM 3643/2
: