Mrhand
Reference
3.
HONG KONG JUDICIARY : PENSIONS.
I have been looking at past correspondence & papers on
subject.
GI
this
I've accept ODAS expert advice, then I think Mr Ruckfords suggestions should not be runned. The crux of matter 13 in para 2
No
J
the
I can see
Mr West's letter where he states that they would establish an underirable precedent to the gives. forming that we do day Mr Rundfucks ideas, John an alterated but accepting a scheme on the lines of the West Indies Awangements. Mr West
you rejected this idea, Hag A. but looking at what was actually said (links), I find
that you did not completely reject it, as it had some points in its ferm. The particula difficulty
bother
says
complaining
that
Wel
about,
that
you felt it potential treatment
for judges appointed form the Bar. However, aunding to Mr West, this would not be so (panggaph 3), as it would not port
brother judges. (the bar judge) at an advantage over his brother
judges." "H this is corect (& DA should know) then I see no reason why we should not write to Hong Kong accordingly. Something the line of the draft at (39) would be suitable. It is we wrote to Hong Kong on this particular ouljeet.
каж
how over a
•sime he
er a year sines
HKK 14/14 31968/9 HICK 14/210 Altador
APB Lamber
ll. Sallard carlin files.
тре
ビ
EX.292
16-11-71.
DD 737719 557664 500M 2/71 GM 3643/2
Page 15Page 16