Justiceship that their personal merits do not justify.
The uestion of appointing Scholes S.P.J. reinforces
our doubts whether it is right to have such a post at
all.
3. We should therefore like your views on the
question of abolishing the post of S.P.J. and replacing it by an additional-post pf Puisne Judge, so that we
may consider them in the context of your proposals
for a new post of Appeal Judge. That being so, we do
not propose to take any action on your recommendations
for further appointments to the Supreme Court until
the question of abolishing the post of S.P.J. and
creating a new post of Appeal Judge has been gone
into.
2
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN