P
support Mi Carter's recommendations. The full vigner of the Invernor's proposals
only in terms of
to be justifiable only in
seen to a
Валь
a
full
scale energency. If there fore they have a place
Energency Regulations. The Ivernor has
it is
-
understandably since 1967
done his best
Huse
get
ink
The ordinary
Laws of the Colony
parts of the then introduced Energency legislation
which should really form part of the ordinary
law. But Secs 122 x 123 122=123
in the form in
which
vanto them
cannot fall into this
21
category.
I have
sympathy
with his
desive us
Fraw
by
a
anandment
attention k there
at this moment. J
jace