NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
W(B)L 51-7406
??
·GAP-
Comperettante said that textiles use split in the same limited duty free quota.
SIRDAVED thought the byt everybody aut
MR BON TOMILY felt it was
LAMB
ambiguous
way or for the
had 2 points: (1) Whether it would be batte I recall out R) Whether HKs exclusion was bet. The
by
hable.
He would not tike to see textites excluded by the EEC. benefits they would give wee limited.....
they got the way, it would be disadantageon to the
Commonwealth.
COPERTIN. felt that the implied the UK would ente the EEC &
still mantan the exchang textiles
LANK said this did not folla. The advantage was that they emld pesunde (the EEC?) to take textiles out of their
He.
COMMONTANANTE said the Ezzwa, still smpicion of this as a petext to..
Сток
LAMB
??
COWPARTHIWATE
77
UK motives & used
said this could help other Commonwealth countries, but
not HK,
said the would give
chance
Commonealth supplies a greater
a certain part represents on exports.
CAME said the UK was unwilling to persuade the 26x to
exclude textiles.
Davis said that in the enlarged Community... if the EER gar pretences on Textiles them in the calculating quarks дал a huge one would go to Ukwith HK excluded being a Dependent Territory.
LAMP said he could not make it a stipulation; thee was
COMPERTHAWAINE
time to
argut.
CANADIANLONIA felt Hey should argue to schede katiles.
no
EXCLUSION