and Korea and Taiwan

DRAFT

CONFT DENTI AL

Textiles

Te United States has been pressing for arrangements which would enable them

to restrict their imports of non-cotton textiles (to meet cornitments entered into

during Fresident Hixon's election campaign).

The GATT contains an eccare clause (Article XIX) enabling countries to

restrict imports when rising imports are causing or threatening serious injury to

domestic producers, but the US Government has declined to invoke this provision

because the US textile industry generally has been enjoying increasing prosperity

and because they would have to compensate the countries whose trade has been

affected by reducing tariffs on othor items. A dangerous precedent, not only for

textiles, would be set if the United States restricted textile imports in these

circumstances (except perhaps in the narrow sectors, if any, in which they might

be able to show that imports were causing or threatening serious injury). The

United States have therefore not received a sympathetic response, either to their

ideas of a comprehensive general scheme of restraints for non-cotton textiles on

the lines of the existing GATT Long Term Arrangement for Cotton Textiles (tho ITA)

or to their recent approaches to Japan and Hong Kong for comprehensive bilater]

restraints.

There is a risk that, if no way out of their problem is offered to the US

Administration, Congress will pass legislation unilaterally irposing import

rastrictions on a broad sector of non-cotton textiles. This would be contrary to

the GATT and seriously damage the fabric of international commercial roïations.

Some damage of this kind would also result if the US induced the Japanese to

accept comprehensive bilateral restraints. Our best hope at present is to keep

alive and develop the idea put forward by the EEC at the recent meeting of the

GATT Cotton Textiles Comittee, of a GATT study of the possible problems in

non-cotton textiles,

pacnotic to the US dos

SerCTED DÉ

pestpekrīta în trade int

kon textile

impor fair that this

CONFIDENT AL

Page 225Page 226

Share This Page