Reference.....
(N. ~ T. Dept.).
Mr. Gloyer.
I attack a
tentative Daft Saving Despatel
for Hong Kong, langely based on minute o
you
14
May
Shich
1
should be grateful Par
your
views
1
and those 57
must apologise for the
your legal adviser.
very long delay in
dealing with these
papers
I'm afraid they were
buried
underneatt
more immediate
paplus.
1.R. Pumay
10.9.70.
Hong Kong Dept.
[read. 21/9] Mr. Murray...
I see no need to detail the arrangements of 1964-68 as there were described in our Saving Despatel of al 31/7/675 have amplified the adorce on requitability of agreements. It is not clew to me whether it is all one to H.K. Dyt. whether or not there instruments are in the form of treaties. If it is a matter of indifference to H.M.G, could we not let Hong Kong decide-subject, of coure, to the wiles of the other country concerned?
I
2. It is umal for legal advice to be given by the legal adviser dealing with the Department on whose files the particular subject is entered. Jassume, therefore, that
Jassume, therefore, that you would wish to consult legal advise in this matter.
your.
Mr Ruckford.
Aflower 25/2.
Acording to Mr. Murray, any predecessor, we can let Hong Kong decide whether ownst to Please see Mr Glove's miniate (above) and
/the