be doubly handicapped if excluded by
other donor countries.
3.
We have the following observations on the
reasons which have been advanced in favour of
excluding Hong Kong:-
(a) Hong Kong is a territory and therefore
the responsibility of the metropolitan
power
(i) We regard the distinction between
"territories" and "countries" as
irrelevant in the context of
economic development.
(ii) There is no practical alternative
to Hong Kong's dependent status.
Hong Kong remins a dependant "
territory for political reasons.
(iii) Hong Kong is a separate customs
area and derives no specific
advantage from the GATT as a
Hoste dependant territory. (her exist-
ing preferences in the UK will
disappear if the UK offer is
maintained.
An OECD report on preferences (the
(iv) According to an OBOD document
report of the Group of Four) which published in 1967 (broadly Ministers broadly endorsed in 1967 stated that endorsed by Ministers) "any
country, territory or area may
claim developing status"
(b) Hong Kong is not "developing"
(i) with the exception of a limited
range of manufactures, Hong Kong
is far closer to the concept of a
developing country than a
developed one.
- 2 -
CONFIDENTIA
CONFIDENTIAL
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN