3.
I have the following comments on those
clauses in the Bill which are enumerated
below:
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
Clause 3 (a)
new definition of
I believe that in the sub-sub
clause interpreting "employee"
where they appear in the first and third lines)
ん
the words "worked under",may be
The ex
a mis print for "works under cf. ating definition
which is to be deleted).
workman
Clause 4 (b)
-Saving Dorporate
As you indieated in your temporary.
protection to these groupings
workers to which it applies.
Clause 12
I must qustion whether it is
wisel to exclude from trade union
Affores reful
коров
office so wide a categry (potentially)
must be
as, those convicted at any time
of any crime punishable with
2 years or more im risonment.
I accept the force of the arguments
you use in paragrah 4 of your
saving depatch, but I am inclined
to think that the same arguments
you use against excluding persons
convicted of crimes in connection
aloc
with disturbances apply against
^
the exclusion of So wide a catagry
of convicted persons. You may wish to consider whether it would NOT
The
be preferable to apply sort
of prohibition customaryelsewhere,
which imposes a time limit, say
of 5 years, on convictions taken into