Страсний
GOVERNMENT HOUSE
HONG KONG
Kai-Tak:
Note No 16 refers.
to
The question of Kai-Tak and of civil rights avection rights There contumes
generate
considerable
souther in Hong Kong, despite the Governor's
statement in Legislative Council
on for October.
2. Sir John Cowperthwaite said tot Hongkong this expected
thei's original request a 1967
M
an answer to
this presently avants a mustered demon
But his plan is to poolte go for contractio finance
and
(par. 2). he raid that "at that stage presumably £.C.G.) might be mosted it if & Porter proms secuted any part of the contract.
prommetty
3. Sur Hugh Norman. Wather afterworth ached whether consulerting could not be given further to the remission of the 1959 ban. This, be Thought, might allay The widespread of wikim
an
в
could be justifies
gromes contribution to Brian's resources
argument is If Not No 10.
Hong Kong and special Treatment
ducat
this Knitch in making
The reasons
nt out in para. G. Thi
what ignored in the Trenowy's
as reproduced in para :26,
and
}
Care
whers it is covered in other correrponance who me
Treasury, I showed have thought that Love Shepherd night on
adorsed to the it up at menerience level with the Timmwry. I do not
Thin
in
B&T grace por comunication cqrepunet would have the same