No
سد
I agree
Mir
I agree
MW
Hr Cartes.
The restrictive interpretation arises from
para 2
?
Q4
Neither fir Leslie
2.
Monson nor
Mˇ Wilforsi
would require visas for a visit to the
Colony !
(a) because they
mim unity
would, have diplomatic
(b) breause it is most unlikely that their
visin would last longer. months. They would therefore
under para
thergram.
لی
than.
those
be exentit
circular
8
the attached
3. The difficulty of defining a
always raises problems for
다.
"OK, belonger
various individual
cases and it was for this reason
that the
Hong Kong definition
was not queries.
69
Mr. Wilford
2.
३०.१.
You will wish
Sam I am doubtful
para 2 (a) above to
and Sur L. Nonsen
(G).
to see.
about the application of
F.C.O. Mcials,
are
but
you
certainly covered by
The manuscript addition to para I
3.
5 Thick
न
the draft boy should stand
with the
addition of the words "issived in the United
Kingdom" after "passports."
Mr. Gammana
The brief can
bus. Carter Jawr. Come 1/10
али
3019/69