unlawful meeting etc. This will provide a defence for an accused innocent

bystander who becomes unintentionally involved in an unlawful asserbly

without knowing that it is one.

9.

Clause 8 amends section 14 by widening the defences to a charge

of carrying an offensive weapon at a public meeting or in a public process.on.

Clause 9 is intended to make it clear that the offence contained

10.

In aubsection (3) of section 15 is aimed at those who organize a public

gathering in contravention of, and after the issue of, a prohibition under

subsection (1). This amendment will reet the objections made In paragraph

17 of the Justice Report.

11.

In the comments in the Note on paragraph 18 of the Justice Report, it was suggested that the words "noisy, disorderly or intimidating"

might be added before "manner" in the second line of section 18(1). In the

Saving Despatch the comment was made that it would be preferable to refer

to conduct in a "disorderly manner", on the ground that the word "noisy" was too vague and might be caused by cheerful spirits and not evil intent,

The Commissioner and that "intimidation" is covered by the word "disorderly".

reasonably

of Police has objected that a group of persons could conduct themselves

other than in a disorderly manner and yet still cause other people

a breach of the peace. There is thought to be substance in this objection

and the Secretary of State ia asked to recons:der the matter, though an

amendment has been included by clause 10. The other amendments in this

clause will meet the objections raised in paragraphs 19 and 20 of the

Justice Report.

12.

The Despatch suggested that there should be some element of

mens rea in order to establish the offence under section 19 of the

The difficulty is, however, that this would make the burden

Ordinance.

of proof on the prosecution so great as to render the section ineffective.

In practice the police, when confronted with an unruly mob, order it to

disperse. Those who choose to remain must expect to be treated as active

participants. In Hong Kong, a crowd forms with astonishing speed and is

quickly and easily transformed into a dangerous mob. The police must be

able to deal with these situations swiftly. If the police are forced to

separate spectators from participants when handling a riot, there might

be fatal hesitation in dealing with a dangerous situation.

The Secretary

Share This Page