{

"You may also a how this new figure compares, in proportion to

our whole revenue, wi.. previous arrangements. In fact, this proporti

is narkedly smaller tan when the first post-war defence contribution

́of £1 m. was fixed: was about 51% then and wil, be about 44% now.

"Lastly, I must take some observations on th: suggestion that

larger police force could control the internal security situation here

as well as an army ga vison and that we need no ga rison. I an efraid

this is just not true Apart from any other reasons, the role of polic

and military in the control of disturbances is qui e different; they al

complementary to each other, and are not interchan eable. In consequer 2,

they are differently trained and equipped and cann t take over each

other's duties. Furthermore, we are in any case h ving to expand the

Police Force es rapidly as we can to deal with the normal need for police

expansion. We could not expand it much faster, ev n if we would. Fingly.

I would ask you not to overlook entirely the great value of the armed

services, with their special training and equipmen, in times of nature.

disaster. Here is an advantage which we get from heir presence which

is not always fully appreciated.

"May I now try, at some risk I must warn you of over-simplification,

First, we have come to a satisfactory arrangement

to attempt a summary.

for the future over the Services' land-holdings; which we will provide

free as needed, and take back freely when no longer wanted. Second,

we have, this financial year and last, been making payments at the rate

a year: of which £11⁄2 . was the formal defence contribution;

of £5 m.

£11.

<p>

was in respect of the £6 m., 6-year, building programme; and the

remainder of £21 m. is accounted for by payments under various other

agreements. In the next 4 financial years, the arrangement calls for us

to pay £5 m. a year the same as the current amount in ell; which works

out in fact to be £21 2. a year more than we would have had to pay under

ell our existing arrangements, supposing they had continued unchanged

which, I may say, is supposing a great deal. This is £1 3/4 m. less over the 4 years than called for in the proposals Hr. Le brought with him: and, of course, very much less than we were originally asked to consider paying、

Share This Page