decision to prosecute, much would depend in my view on the frequency
and length of the visits and, of course, it would be preferable if
in addition there was some other direct evidence that the purpose
of his visits was illegal.
4. I think that paragraph 7 should be deleted. As an item for
discussion something along the following lines might be added:
Imposes
(e) "What is the strength of the evidence that the purpose of his visits to the school are illegal and cannot reasonably be passed off as related to his interests as owner of the
premises? The frequency of such visits could be an indication but other evidence of a more positive and
conclusive nature would seem desirable before legal action is considered necessary.
11
19 May, 1969
b.&. Carter ак
(W. S. Carter)
{ •
Hong Kong Department
Mr. Carter
I think it is worth keeping in paragraph 7 as amended by me and then adding as paragraph 8 (e) the point in your paragraph 4. Subject to this I agree the draft brief.
2.
I have replied to Mr. Denson.
تسمه
(J. O. Moreton)
20 May 1969.