use of Article XIX. The position seemed to be that the Ministry of

Technology were in favour of pressing for any restraints on non-

cotton textiles to be imposed under Article XIX while the Board of

Trade and the FCO were against this proposition.

The present position seemed to be as he had said at the outset that

further moves depended on the Japanese. If the Japanese gave way

to the Americans on the question of voluntary restraint, then the

other Asian countries would have to do so also. If, on the other

hand, there was to be an international discussion of the problem of

textile imports into the USA, then the UK and the FEC would prefer this to take place in GATT and not in the

th CTC.

A decision should be taken on what the line was to be in the

discussions with Mr. Ernst of the ERC Commission. The EEC had

mooted the last meeting of the Cotton Textiles Committee the idea

that there should be "a GATT study" and the question arose whether

we wanted to elaborate this. His own view was that we probably

should not attempt to elaborate this at this stage.

Mr. Jones said that there was a difference between the interests

of Hong Kong and Japan if there was to be any question of extending

the CTA to non-cotton textiles.

Hený

Kony

exorted to the USA something

like 400 million square yards of cotton textiles against only

100 million square yards of m.m.f. textiles. The Japanese figures,

however, were approximately something less than 400 million square

yards of cotton and more than 400 million square yards of m.m.f.

It followed from this that Hong Kong would prefer that there should

be provisions for "roll-in" of quotas for cotton and m..f. goods

while it would suit Japan better to have separate quotas for cotton

and m.m.f. This led to the conclusion that Hong Kong would do

better under a system by which cotton and m.m.f. textiles were con-

They

trolled under the same instrumen

instrument, and,would therefore prefer any

discussion of restrictions on m.m.f. textiles to be within the

Cotton Textiles Committee.

/Mr. Jordan

Page

Share This Page