Ou trence: BRI/LMC
Your reference:
бусая
BRITISH TRADE COMMISSION IN HONG KONG
7th Floor, Shell House, Queen's Road, Central, Hong Kong Mail Address: P.O. Box No. 528, Hong Kong Cable Address: "Uktrade Hongkong” Telephone- 230176
17. Stewart
Thy does no-lähe
un very much further
forward. Won 42
Scan Sung,
31 January, 1969
But muuw of x
I do not see what more
They can do
Jon.
Thank you for your HKK 6/548/3 of 16 January which reached us on 28 January.
2. Surely this is not the Adam Watson who used to be in the Foreign Service? But whether he is or not his information is correct. The facts of the case are well known and have been the subject of correspondence between this office and British Leyland. At my request their Export Sales Manager, Mr. L.J. Portman, visited Hong Kong
As a result of what I at the beginning of December 1968. told him British Leyland are stationing a senior salesman here for a few months to lobby the Hong Kong Government and the Transport Advisory Committee.
3. Briefly the position is that the Kowloon Motor Bus Co. is in financial difficulties. They therefore want to revise their fares and to alter the terms of the royalty they pay to the Government. Both of these things necessi-
The General tate revision of the franchise ordinance. Manager of the bus company is being wooed by the Japanese and I fear that the Hong Kong Government will not be averse to ditching the "Buy British clause in the franchise during the forthcoming revision if he asks them. the origins of this clause. I guess it must date from the immediate post-war days although the present franchise ordinance only dates from 1960.
LAST
REF.
W. S. Carter, Esq.,
Hong Kong Department,
I do not know
ever.
Yours
Michae S
(M.P.V. Hannam)
جے
Principal Trade Commissioner
Foreign and Commonwealth Office,
London, S.W.1.
VED IN
ARCHIVES No.31 = 7 FEB 1969
HKX6/548/
Every effort is made to ensure that the information given herein is accurate, but no legal responsibility is accepted for any errors or omis- sions in that information and no responsibility is accepted in regard to the standing of any firms, companies, or individuals mentioned.
128