}
Dept. then tried to turn
the subject
over
referred it
to I Aman dept who have now
back to us.
2.
The particular point raised in
Miss Muskett's letter does seem to
and not yirt
be a
more general one
a question of the bilateral agreement. The question is perhaps whether we should take on
or whether S. Asia Dept. should
whole subject jenter it and then consult us.
the
3. Mr. Murray (Hong Kong Dept.) tells
that the
only
action
meeting at the B.O.T.
me
he
in
refer
has laken since the
to
to his
own dept's legal adviser the question of
whether
en
Artich 8
rely she herself grants no
ther India is entitled to of the Agreement when preferences to Hong Kong
Anne Stoddart
14/7.
•