and we
feel that representations
must be centred
on this point
6
$t. As to the content of
are
our
representations, we
in no doubt that the extended queta restrictions introduced by these Community
measures
is
esso infringe Hong Kong's
GATT rights, A
We are
Aware
however,
that--what Enett in descursions in Hong Kong Ernst alluded to the possibility
in June
The Community might seek to justify
that thing
h
thew action under an interpretation of
Article 19 of the GATT
(poract)
to the record.
and,
according
answered Derek Jones'
expression of disbelief that this was possible
by
a statement to the effect that
адекваться
It was legalistic thinking
12at did not pay sufficient regard to
alties involved in the establishment
the realities
of a Community portion".
Commission
Ey the
pursued this tack in answering
our representation's
world
h
There I seem to be
two posible courses open
only
(a)
threaten to.
To arraign
ん
GATT
to
as :
The Community
in
This could do our own
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
Canse
no good
and
?
I feel fairley
net
رجام
Sure that- Hong Kong world w
Comider Welt it's assess interests best served by this action.
to offer consultations under Article