to consider separately the points roused by Rebrille.
However, acceptance of
This Hong Kong amendment will not
resolve Nelville's points; it leaves
in the ani
What
These
o hard
are
to be
Kar sts
·
Arrangements
effect is to qualify only the application of para 4 ; by umplication the rest of The statement will apply to international
organisation's
Delville
that he is
about
and
it is clear from
comments and proposals
for example,
unhappy
the reference in para 5(a)
to the possibility that HMG and Hong
Kaną might
policies in
pursue divergent
GAFT or
UNCTAD.
c lue have lord Melville
that his suggestions with be taken
further
into account in the fur
Comideration we
shall
be quiną
to the statement (Goldimitz's
letter
112 2
December)
St-
seems to im
That
the choices before us
are
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN
(a) to "fuzz" the issue
g
international
organisations by leaving the amended Martement (including the proposed
document
addition to para 4) as it is and