Reference..
Mr. Britten has observed, if the request came from the FCO it would carry more authority. There is possibly a case for handling this in a manner which leaves the
response very much to the discretion of
each post. In any case, I would propose an expanded but tighter text than that
suggested by Mr. Maddocks and, if it is
agreed in principle that a letter should be
sent, would put forward an alternative
draft.
26 June, 1969
L. 5. Carter Саль
W.
(W. S. Carter)
Hong Kong Department
suppat lai's proposal.
1
the instimaticis
1
kizuka
120
lo past's
sud. certainly
issur from lim Fco.
1
agree with Thi In:
Carter on
point's cds
(d) r ces alsae
;
bout ou
must accept that past's will gradually
fall out
af
ستام
way of copying
matten
the instimclicans are
1
wed. Tunik ItK.
To Hang Kang unters
periodically reneword.
Dep! cught to keep pmit to ad
1
суре
as
a
an Eye
Eye on he backstop.
lace. Shagan
t
8.7
W. European Dep?
with Mr. Morgan.
пилоти
/In so fer
12vi: