functions as the staff transferred to them, and

consequently no problems of assimilation erose.

3. The particular points in the terms offered by the

Hong Kong Government that the Minister of Public Building

and Works regarded as unsatisfactory were:-

(i) point of entry into the Hong Kong salary scales;

(ii) promotion prospects

(iii) position in the event of a redundancy situation.

not

These "disabilities" all in fact derived from the Hong Kong

Government's view that none of the H.P.B.W. staff could be

granted on transfer to the Hong Kong Service a seniority

determined by the length of their their U.K. Government

and

service tax must enter the Hong Kong service as new

tax

entrants (as did the Navy Department personnel made redundant

different Forms case for speed

upon the closure of the Navel Dockyard. The M.P.B."'s Puent verted on the any winend"

in the proper semie of the weased

that their staff could not be regarded as redundant, as the

work had still to be carried out and was being taken over by

Gort

employ

existing the Hong Kong which should therefore by them (in their jobs)

h

in the Hong Kong service.

4.

While regarding it as reasonable that the M.F.B.W. should do what

they could to get the best possible terms for these U.K. Go ver ment

employees, both the C.0. and the Treasury considered that this

was essentially the Hong Kong Government's problem and a matter

on which the decisions of that Government would have to be

accepted Terms, conditions and staff practices in the U.K.

could not be applied to U.K. staff world-wide. They must be

The adapted to correspond to local conditions. Hong Kong Government's

funds and not H.M.G's were involved. The interests of its

civil service were involved; it could not ignore the reactions

of its staff associations which would strongly contest the

7

supercession of serving Hong Kong officers. The M.P.B.. staff wirded

all

cin of

were ocal residents and the Hong Kong Government, balancing their

agat Ihose of Hinwand serving Hong Kong officers!

both, was bound to be es fair as it could

theinterests

towards them. The way in which the Naval Dockyard staff

/were

Share This Page