3。
(e) on the torudnation of the occluued na Na
application of attor of the parties, subeer" the competent authority otherales deef3.3
You mention in your paragraph 3 that you discussed this palet with Mr. Topley in 1964. However, at that time, the Contracte for CourteLo Eployant Ordinance was only in a drafting stage, and it was not watt), this Ordinance became laws in 1965 that anyone was in a position to say countkey n would be included in the law and that would not.
4.
With regard to your caments about Clanse 15 of the centraa, I have two points to maka. Firstly, this Clause has been cleared with the United Kingdom Government which has informed us in writing that day are proZÁIGÓ to perform the required functions. Moreover, Section 5(11)(h) of the Cefinanco expressly stipulates that contracts shall not be transferred accept with the endorazzant of the transfer upon the contract by an officer or efftadel NZ country in which the contract is performed. You will see, therefore, that to do as requested by you would be a direct contraventica of the Kang Kang logíalácie
5.
The advice of the Hong Kong Chinese Liaison Office is boing sought in respect of your suggested wording of Clause 17 of the centrest and I will address you later on this.
IRP/SMSH/hlow
Yours faithfully,
(I. R. Prico)
for Colosioner of Labou
མཐམས་