Mr Rushford.
Reference..
||
At & is the Hong Kong reply to our telefonam at. They have by me matous fallen in
with all out
suggestions, but I think the draft
Bill as now ammended (aut front coon)
considerable improvement on
is
the pressur
to show
2.
The Bill at te
has been amended
نم
usnów
whai Hong Kong proposes to do. They do not to amand the penalties which are preting Score, but I think they have met was on our
want
main points.
Would
3. You should see
the
VW
you
a.gree
(1), from which it appears
that
Bill, has already been promulgater, Aresumably
it's original form to which we
nivesity
Agicted. The
amordiants will be moved at the
Committee Stinge.
ای کاری
least
Clause $5,
To which
(o
E
to be one
Z
одість,
Azèctionally
Elsuites of the Bill.
The bar
Behind
26% Dail
in the carlis draft Bill. to which
1964.
4.
As
agrand
regards, para & of Œ, I suppose it wadi
bes less
orjectionable if the offending provisions appeared only in emergency registation,
this might require Ministrul apparsal.
even tha's
(3) Ps. I have,
ANG
19. 10.67.
Eblamed a copy of
as published: it is at fe.
L
the
Biss