Reference.......
-/12
27/
RECEIVED IN ARAT No.56
18 JANSS
DD). 2/1/12
Mr Figgl
Ref(12). The explanation
T7/e/iv
to me reasonable.
2.
in
рала
3 seems
Please find out whether the Loam Agreement with Bennce has been signed and if not whither Brack's suggestion is prasible
3.
in
his para As regards
para 5., he hasn't answered the question posed @. The point here is that Mcd are for the Defence of.
pilots in
fach
my para 4 if
responsible
at all to
Colonies and if there contribute anything
the Defence of Hong Kong, part of
charge should be borne
this exha
Defence botes.
4.
Have
comments?
you any
Roma
22/11
Mr. Ellison
I
have been prosenally
alltrinja Whit
dant thank you involved with this question before,
Incubes
You may
I
1
FE. & PD. have of some been consulted. like to take Caft. Acht's minte
a point of departure
I 21 Supt. at (8) as
さ
for looking at this file and its predecessor.
2. Ahr. Masan has agreed (see thr.
Blair's marguiad nike ai
Capt. Collett's moute at (8)) that the Brunei Govt.
may
be
notified that amortized trained charge will them for any replacements
to their present
be raised aganist them for
they way
ask
Jar
Secanted RACE flying promil.
in view of the deterioration
withh
*.,.༩༣.Ã༠༠,
bunei sure
Jo
کہاں
relations
Mr. Masa fte tirak
-/gave