CONFIDENTIAL
FLAG F
whether we proceed to the formal notification of deregistration
before deciding whether to delay visas further.
4.
The reaɛche previously advanced by the Governor in favour of deregistration all still stand, and I agree that it would be very difficult now to go back on the decision. If we do so, it would be heiled as a very significant victory by the local Communists in a sector which is of great importance to them and would demonstrate
I think there- thet e policy of blackmail over viess yields results.
The Governor' fore that we must stand by the original decision. willingness to release two more detainees at the same time as notifi--- cation is given would be a useful countervailing gesture which might be reinforced if he felt able to increase the number to say three or
four.
5. As to the suggestion that the diplomatic offensive be reacti- vated (supported in Peking telegram No. 722), I doubt very much whether, even if we took action immediately, we could expect govern- ments to bring any pressure to beer in Peking before 13 August. have put the exercise off once already; and, particularly since one
Mr. Peters has in the meantime senior member of the staff
-
received his erit visa, governments are likely to be more reluctant than ever to take action before a reasonable period of time haa elapsed and it is clear that the delay is more than another routine
We should however cer- example of Chinese unpleasantness towards us. tainly keep up the pressure on the Chinese.
The best method would,
I think, be to isque a public statement say on 12 August if Sir D. Hopson's visa is not granted by 10 August in accordance with his
../request.
CONFIDENTIAL