CONFIDENTIAL

be a disadvantage in the fact that we could not speak up in the G.A.T.T. on Ilong Kong's behalf against a Community policy to

which we had already agreed.

10, Mr. Cowperthwaite said that, insofar as G.A.T.T. rights

depend on powers of retaliation, Hong Kong was in a weak

position, since whenever the Hong Kong Government had seriously

considered retaliation against a country which had acted against

Hong Kong's exports, they had concluded that this would do more

harm to Hong Kong than to the offender. The fact that Hong

Kong had favourable trade balances with most of the countries

concerned still further restricted the scope for retaliation.

It was true that she had in the past considered the possibility

of retaliation against France, with whom she had an unfavourable

trade balance, but it remained the Government's firm practice

not to retaliate.

economy was so export-orientated that the damage it would

suffer as a result of retaliatory measures would be

proportionally much higher than the damage caused, for example,

to the German economy as a result of the loss of German exports

to Hong Kong. Mr. Audland said that, while retaliation might

not affect the whole of the offender's economy seriously, it

could if concentrated in a sensitive and politically vocal

sector, have a significant effect. It might be possible,

especially when allocating major capital goods contracts,

to find cases where the extra cost to Hong Kong of discriminating

against a particular supplier was negligible. Mr. Selwyn

Mr. Haddon-Cave added that the Hong Kong

suggested that, given the changing pattern of world trade,

Hong Kong at some time in the future have to reconsider her

position on retaliation e ven at a certain cost to herself.

-5-

CONFIDENTIAL

/Declaration.....

Share This Page