!
TOP SECRET
?
the cultural revolution. Hence, I do not believe that we should say any- thing which suggests that we are prepared to discuss anything but the specific issues mentioned by the Vice Minister.
50
6.
On these specific issues:
(a) The works of Mao the basic point of course is that the 'activi- ties' associated with the study of the works are more often than not inconsistent with the maintenance of law and order. Our language in dealing with this point needs therefore to be especially carefully judged.
(b) Future of prisoners. This is clearly the only issue on which we have much freedom of maneouvre, but, given the fuss about the two film stars, I wonder if it is tactful at present to come out again with the formula about 'releasing to China'. It seems to me that there is a case initially at any rate for using more oblique wording; but suggesting that the question is open for discussion.
(c) Compensation. This is a point on which we cannot be forthcoming. Payment of damages to Communists in respect of losses allegedly suffered during the disturbances would be interpreted here as a com- plete surrender on the part of the Government and a repetition of the pattern of Macau. On any calculation the damage caused by the Communists themselves to individuals, property, and the economic interests of the Community as a whole, must greatly outweigh any personal losses that they have suffered. I do not think that we can do more than indicate that if any individual Communist feels he had claim for damages, it is open to him, under the law, to seek redress through the Courts.
My immediately following telegram contains a suggested redraft of the statement which takes the points above into account.
F.O. please pass Immediate Peking as my telegram No. 136.
Sir D. Trench
[Repetition to Peking referred for departmental
decision.]
ADVANCE COPIES SENT
FILES
C.O. Ha.H.K.D.
I. & G.D.
HD P.A.D.
P.S.
P.S. to Lord Shepherd
Mr. Hall
Mr. Robb
F.O. HD. F.E.D.
P.U.S.D.
Sir D. Allen
Sir D. Greenhill P.S.I.
77777
TOP SECRET