1219
Reference....ill 1788
H" Carter.
The attached mimo. by
Sir Donald
Hopson makes out a
persuasive case and
Sw 17. Galsworthy
This is the memorandum by
would suffat a great deal of his reasoning. But he oversimplifies the Hong Kong point
may
To of view.
mind the rather brushes aside or underestimates the effects
A
Ov
Sw). Hopson that public opinion, in Hong Kong of the measures I mentioned to you. that be advocates in paras 15-17.
Its
not be right when the ecoming
Los Carh
1218/68
(para. 13)
may
CV
may
that it is a
false
assumption
that amy
concussions
to
Chinese are
thank
likely
to
lead only
to further
demands.
But there is a
dame ge
посту жо
to puthie confiance (wieluding
even police morose) of complementing his
recommendations would be suck
as
positively
real danger,
that the
which coomed undoubtedly be
to encourage or
to invite further
pozomeve
circumstances-
forthcoming
2.
in those in.
It is the that our present policies in
không Kang
likely
do not appear at the moment to produce any pospect of light
родите
at the and of c
the
tunnel. But I think
he is corong when he maintains (para 13)
that
it is arguable that public opinion
is commied at the
in Hong Kong of confrontation. I don't think
continuation
the