hkrs163-1-2395-emergency-legislation — Page 16

National Archives 英國國家檔案館 All

"Haslemere" Royal Laval boats assisting dovernant should cary a Police
officer, It has similarly boon roed that koyal laval boats when used in
aid or the Government should open fire Only in зelf defence,

3.

As

Present policy therefore makos these tegulations unnecessary and I
think you will agree that there is now no need for thea to continue in
force. Goverment therefore proposes to revoke the no regulations.
Adequate emergency powers ill be retained for the Royal Navy in the
legislation which it is pro osed to urait an hold in readiness for
immediate enactment at the outset of any enteroncy. you know these same
principles ant criteria are being applied to all the emergency
legislation. If it is not nooded, the policy is to revoke it; if it may
be needed in normal times it should be incorporated in permanent law; if
it is needed only in times of ergency then it should be held in draft in
the way described above.

Lo

You will of course be kept fully consulted on the emergency
legislation which it is proposed to hold i drett. This latter exorcise
will principally concern the Emergency (Principal) egulations 1949 a
copy of which will shortly be sent to you.

5.

If you have any comments on the proposed revocation I snall be
grateful to have them as early as possible so that the necessary lod
measures may be put in hand.

c.o. H. .L.F. (Cdr. Leonard)

Hon. A.G. (Mr. Davidson).

AJSIJW.

(A. J. Shephard)

C

ANFIDENTIAL

for Colonial Secretary

REGISTRY

6/13

OUTWARD

LETIT

val

G.F. 73

0000730

000x100-3/62-B28360

MEMO

From..

Colonial Secretariat

To Government Printer

Ref...

Tel. No............

(142)

95302

....

in CR.6/3231/59 II

Date 5 March, 1963,

Your Ref.

in..

dated.

2.

Emergency and Defence Regulations

Your Reference P/Gen. 90 (II) of the 6th. February, 1963.

I shall be grateful to have copies of these Regulations as carly as
possible as they are now the subject of detailed discussion with
Departments and the Armed Services.

AJS: jw.

(A. J. Shephard) for Colonial Secretary

REGISTA

CONFIDENTIAL

50

OUTWARD

G.F. 73

0000730

20.000x100-3/62-B28360

MEMO

From..

Government Printer

To Hon. C. S.

Ref..

.in

P/GEN. 90 (II)

Tel. No..

703616

Your Ref. (142)

Date 7th March, 1963.

in CR 6/3231/59 II dated... 5.3.63.

Emergency and Defence Regulations

All being well, I hope to have these available for supply

by the end of March.

SY:cck

По

(S. Young) Government Printer

CONFIDENTIAL REGISTRY

14/9

NO....

DATE.

INWARD LETTER

VU LIBUIJAJEU LEU

*

C. S. 20A

From the Governor, Hong Kong

To the Secretary of State for the Colonies

Repeated to:-

Repeated to:- Date.........

22

My Reference......

(5) in

For mo

| 2011/416

of y for the six

T

L 1:

11.

(a)

unct. i.

(b)

144

SAVINGRAH

No.

No.

No.

Your Reference..

tet auch bho rẻ visst Li the lat ..

2,

1 3.

vrt wel to the generi maiti n

Gura ry 1. JT

+

reglucij gauti. tovoxed In ON

1

ie a 3

...:r futuTV?.

130

(c)

t

(Tiki xil)

Q

sitim wi Ja

13 0

B2

(r)

TOV

i

الم

'

La y Sw

77

sted 172:

1.

t181

Bild up vadi

in

C

143 boen

"The 3 le f" wi tilay so wit:

It 11 10,

by Des end of lol. af all

wir 111

- vl. r. with

will give an ini

er, oncy 2.

revision of

or revisi in

71

JULI

vetivoly to

FuTeað Gude in the 2.

inilesiog terugres.

hur

Le

wede i ti ei.

AB roprio No future:

ΤΟ que bo ta 20

ef

(a)

to mong shad V 11 incur

bible s 100

with

→ Dont i W

✰ ...

hely (vinci: 1)

log 1ms und ɔtuor tea or Ang leciulsti sa us are retired for norail

nor ile tod in the ene. bares to i. la sv ths only awe tin to tls is the
ketorge.cy ( 3

santion;

Salti 5, 1.32, which

in the

:

tabla

30

to rutiin as Zaorganicy logislation mtil rich ti: 13 t y are 33 3 er ro
lind,

(b)

to

zujure a r vijoi jet af reyl time for a futuro fill senle e argane,,
bused in the ...er enoy (ie ci sl) until stiɔna, 2^^. to be jat 1 in
przak ir... by the Govora lust ristor aka Jed in 20 ilos ›; US U VON AS
this tus. iu omakotol, tho . a.rgency (Princi (1) zogulītības

ill be ruy vd.

c.c. ilan. A.G.

12/3011/46

-

}

G.F. 73B (0000732)

5,000x100-10/62-B32165

}

MEMO

(145)

Commissioner of Police

From

To

Telephone

Date

34522 Ext. 251

21st March, 1963

Your Ref:

My Ref:

(19)

CONFIDENTIAL

Ilon. Attorney General

1

in AGO 8/1250/62 of 7.2.63 ...

.in...CP/CCN/95/32

Revision of Emergency Regulations

I agree there are good reasons for consolidating the Emergency (Arms and
Ammunition Ordinance 1933) (Amendment) Regulations 1952 into permanent
law, specifically to meet the case of persons (such as in the recent
K.I.5. case) found in possession of explosives for sabotage and
terrorist purposes. levertheless, on the whole, I consider the penalties
under the Arms and Ammunition Ordinance, Cap. 238, are sufficient for
such purposes.

2.

In the circumstances, I recommend that the Emergency (Arms and
Ammunition Ordinance 1933) (Amendment) Regulations 1952 should be
revoked.

3.

The question of incorporating E.P.R. 25 and 26 into the Public
Order Ordinance is under consideration and I hope to let you have my
recommendations shortly.

CJRD: ja

oc. Hon.C.S. (Mr. Shephard)

Entmist on Eubon't

bile pl.

Ais

22/7

aDawson (C.J.K. Lawson)

for Commissioner of Police

CONFIDENTIAL

NO..

NTIAL REGISTRY

1494 JATE 22/3/63 WIRD CUTIES LETTER

*

X

"

.F. 73 A

CONFIDENTIAL

Το

Hon. C.S. (r. Shephard)

From ...

Legal Department.

Telephone 95219.

Your Ref:

Date...

25th March, 1963...

My Ref:

.in.

II

jn.AGO. 8/1250/62.c.

146!

14:

Revision of Emergency and Defence Regulations.

Emergency (Arms and Anmmition Ordinance)

(Amendment) Regulations, 1952.

These regulations were made in 1952, to provide for a maximum of life
imprisonment for all offences under the Arms and Ammunition Ordinance
Cap. 238; this includes not only the major offences, but also minor
offences such as breach of a condition of licence, failure of arms
dealer to keep accurate stock book, moving arms not properly labelled,
possession of flick-knife etc. While these minor offences carry a
maximum of life imprisonment under s.29 of Cap. 238 as amended by the
Emergency Regulations, two major offences specified in s. 30 carry a
maximum of 14 and 7 years respectively.

2.

The continuance in operation of this amendment for 11 years is an abuse
of the Emergency Regulations procedure, and makes nonsence of the whole
system of maximum penalties. If a maximum of life imprison- ment were to
be needed for any particular offence, the Ordinance should be amended to
provide this through the normal legislative channels.

3.

I have consulted C.P. on these Regulations, and after consideration by
D.C.I and Special Branch, he recommends their revocation without
replacement (C.P.'s memos copied to you dated 23.2.63 and 21.3.63
refer). I have also consulted P.C.C. in charge of criminal matters and
he agrees to their revocation.

4.

Bearing in mind that

(a) discharging a loaded firearm with intent carries life

imprisonment under s. 17 of Cap. 212;

(b) possession etc. of explosive substance with intent to

endanger life or property (the case mentioned by C.P. in his meno dated
21.3.63) carries 20 years under s. 4 of Cap. 206;

(c) possession etc. of explosive substance for any unlawful

purpose carries 14 years under s. 5 of Cap. 206;

(a) any use of a firearm or imitation firearm with intent to

resist arrest carries 14 years under s. 30 of Cap. 238,

I agree that these Emergency Regulations can now be revoked without
replacement in the permanent law.

5.

to Ex. Co.

I accordingly submit a draft revocation order for submission

WSWD anotm

au

(W. S. W. Davidson)

Crown Counsel.

/vf.

CONFIDENTIAL

CAL.

Роза 26/3

------

Citation.

EMERGENCY REGULATIONS ORDINANCE

(Chapter 241)

Emergency (Arms and Ammunition Ordinance) (Amendment) Regulations, 1952
(Revocation) arder, 1963.

In exercise of the powers conferred by section 2 of the Emergency
Regulations Ordinance, the Governor in Council has made the

following Order -

1. This Order may be cited as the Emergency (Arms and

Ammunition Ordinance) (Amendment) Regulations, 1952 (Revocation) Order,

1963.

Revocation.

(G.N.A.26/52).

2. The Emergency (Arms and Ammunition Ordinance) (Amendment)

Regulations, 1952, are hereby revoked.

COUNCIL CHAMBER,

, 1963.

Clerk of Councils.

G.F. 73

0000730

201

90-3/62-B28360

MEMO

From...

Ref.....

(120)

Goverment Printer

To...

Tel. No. 703616

Your

in R/GEN, 90 (II)

Ref....(142)

Hon. C. S. (for Mr. Shephard)

Date 26th March, 1963.

in CR 6/3231/59 IIdated.

Emergency & Defence Regulations

28 Copies of the reprint of this have today been sent to you under
sealed cover.

2.

Your 1949 copy of Hong Kong Regulations will be returned as soon as this
has been rebound.

SY:cck

CONFIDENTIAL REGISTRY

1848 21/3

NO... DATE 2

INHARD

LETTER

*

e

(S. Young)

Government Printer

LOMA.. 18:3

H.K. 10/17/3.

1

4/20181/59

lu:

THE COMMODORE-IN-CHARGE,

HONG KONG

25th March, 1963.

THE COLONIAL SECRETARY,

HONG KONG

(Copy to:- The Commander British Forces,

Headquarters British Forces,

Hong Kong.

EMERGENCY (R.N.) (POLICE PO.ERS) REGULATIONS

Reference:- The Colonial Secretary's letter No. (141) in CR.6/3231/59 II
of

5th March, 1963.

In general it is agreed that the above legislation should be revoked. No
requirements are foreseen to act under the Merchant Shipping Ordinance
1899.

2. It is however considered that if the Royal levy is to continue to
assist in the control of illegal immigration, albeit intermittantly,
some permanent legislation is required due to the likely continuation of
this problem. All that would be required is the power for H.M. Ships to
search and arrest for illegal immigration purposes only, a though for
preference, these powers would not be used they might prove invaluable.

3. The type of situation envisaged is that of H.. Ships in the normal
course of exercising in colony waters being ideally placed to give
assistance of a temporary nature on the receipt of "hot" intelligence by
the Director of Anti Illegal Operations. If the ships were required to
return to harbour to collect a police officer, the object would be lost.

4. There would be no requirement in such permanent legislation
authorising the opening of fire.

5.

This subject was discussed recently with Mr. Davidson (Ion. A.G. Dept.)
who is aware of my views.

Geope Symonds.

(G.O. SYMONDS) COMMODORE.

ONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL REGISTRY

NO.

93 DATE 29/3.

IN YARD

ETTER

:

G.F. 73

0000730

20,000x100-3/62-B28360

MEMO

CONFIDENTIAL

150

From

Director of Marine.

Ref......

Tel. No..

(28)

444447

.in.

H.D. 020/5bc.

Date.

To Logal Department (2).

28th March, 1963.

144

Your Ref. (10)

in.

100 1/625/61. dated 27th March, 1963.

EMERG NCY (ROYAL N VY) (POLIC POJERS

REGULATION', 1949.

I entirely agree with the Commolore and have no objections to tue course
you propose.

2.

There is no conflict with subsection (1) of section 68 of the Merchant
Shipping Ordinance, 1953, which by paragraphs (e) and (d) first allow
any Naval, Army or Air Force Officer's boat to make fast to a suir under
way, but do not allow the Officer mimself actually to board witnout the
permission of the Mastor, etc. The only change will now be that nono of
these gentlemen may fire a suot across tuo ship's bows to slow it down.
I have the thought that all would be rather foolish to try to make fast
when the larger vessel was under any great speed, since they may be
overturned and all drowned, but no doubt the Officers know their own
business.

1944 29/3.

1..

c. Hon. C.S. (Mr. A.J. Shephard)

C.F.

JTH/JH

Mittenst

(J.F.Hewitt)

Director of Marine.

CONFIDENTIAL

3. The type of situation envisaged is that of H.M. Ships in the normal

1

G.F. 73A

0000731

8,000x100-5/62-B28427

Legal Department..

Ref. (9)

Tel. No..

95219

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIALS

To Hon, C.S. (For Mr. Shephard)

.in. AGO 1/625/61

Your Ref.

in

Date 27th March, 1963

dated.

File Emergency

3) m

cc. Hon. C,S. (Mr. Morgan)

/ar.

Director of Anti-illegal Immigration (Mr. Turner) Director of
Immigration.

heg

Revision of Emergency

Defence Regulations

Emergency (Roval Navy) (Police Powers) Regulations. 1949.

As a result of my recent conference with the Commodore, I think I am in
a position to summarize the position as follows

(a) So far as the Commodore is concerned, police powers are no longer
required by the Navy for enforcing the Merchant Shipping Ordinance (I
will ask D. of M. and C.P. to confirm this).

(b) Since adequate police powers will be afforded the Navy in

the Emergency (Principal) Regulations, in time of an emer- gency, no
police powers are now required to enforce the Emergency Regulations
Ordinance.

(c) The Commodore has given instructions not to open fire when acting on
immigration duty, save in self-defence, and he is not interested in
retaining the powers to open fire set out in regulations 4 and 5.

(d) However, since it seems quite probable that the Anti-illegal

Immigration Unitwill wish to call on the Navy from time to time to
assist in their work, it is desirable in the Com- modore's view, that
the Navy should have the minimum powers necessary to enable them to
carry out this task, i.e., the powers to stop, board, search and detain
until they can hand over to the police. They may be asked to assist when
on normal naval duties, and thus when no police inspector is on board.

-

2. After hearing the Commodore's views, it seems to me that we are faced
with a clear choice either to revoke the regulations without re-
placement, in which case we cannot obviously call on the Navy to perform
duties which they are not empowered to perform: limited powers they
require in order to assist us when asked to do so.

or we can give them the

3. In view of the fact that illegal immigration is likely to be a
recurrent problem in Hong Kong, I feel that special circumstances exist
such as would justify the Navy having these powers under the permanent
law.

4. If this is accepted, I suggest that we revert to Mr. Hobley's
proposal to insert a section in the Immigration Ordinance giving those
limited powers.

ر

See Legal Dept. memo to you dated 13.10.60, to which your references are
CR LM 63/60 and CR 26/5061/49.

You will note that the main stumbling block to Mr. Hobley's 1960 draft
was the Navy's insistence on retaining the powers to open fire.

5. It seems that this obstacle has now been overcome : if it is
acceptable to all parties this draft could be used as a basis for an
addition to the first draft of the Immigration Bill.

6. I believe that the Commodore will be replying shortly to your

memo dated 5th March, 1963.

14-1

CONFIDENTIAL

www Dantu

(W.S.W. Davidson)

Crown Counsel

1955

پر کرو جو

G.F. 73B

6,000x100-2/61-B23092

From

Telephone.....

MEMO

CONFIDENTIAL

Legal Department.

..95219.

To

C

Your Ref:

Date.... 27th l'arch, 1963.

My Ref: (10)..

$9 ER 959

CONFIDENT TA L

Q

Director of Marine

Commissioner of Police

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.