fco-21-79-uk-consideration-of-actions-to-be-taken-against-chinese-mission-and-new-china-news-agency-(ncna)-in-london — Page 4

National Archives 英國國家檔案館 All

reportera are sentenced the Chinese will take

further action against the Reuters correspondent

Until the results of the trial are known we

shall not be in a position to decide how

severe measures against N.C.N.A. in London

should be. I am glad, however, that your

officials have agreed that until then approval

for the entry visa of one replacement for the

N.C.N.A. should be withheld and likewise the

extension of the residence permit of another.

I realise the objections you see in principle

to the expulsion of the N.C.N.A. altogether

and to refusing to extend the residence permits

of N.C.N.A. personnel already in this country

and I am willing not to press for this at the

present stage. I think our aim, however,

should be to reduce the expatriate staff of

the N.C.N.A. Office to one (the direct equi-

valent of British press representation in

Peking). I therefore hope that you will agree

that when the trial of N.C.N.A. personnel in

Hong Kong is over, the application for an

entry visa for a replacement in the N.C.N.A.

office should be refused, and all future

/applications

CONFIDENTIAL

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

CONFIDENTIAL

- 3-

applications for replacements refused and

that in addition applications for re-entry

visas by N.C.N.A. personnel in London who

wish to proceed on leave and then return

should also be refused.

I think this is

the least we can do and in certain circum-

stances (paragraph 6 below) more may be

necessary.

5. The reasons for imposing a system of exit

visas on Chinese officials in this country are

set out fully in the memorandum sent to your

Department on 22 July. I believe that such

a system would act as a deterrent against

the holding of British subjects in China,

official and otherwise, and would thus afford

them vital protection. Because the Chinese

operate a system of exit visas, they can at

any time hold foreigners hostage and they

have made it quite clear that they are

prepared to make full and unscrupulous use of

their power. For this reason I would propose

to inform the Chinese Chargé d'Affaires that

all Chinese officials in Britain will in

future require an exit visa from the Foreign

Office before leaving this country. I fully

realise that, if the Chinese disregard this

instruction, we can take only diplomatic action

against them and have no powers of detention.

Nevertheless, I hope that you will feel able

to instruct your Department to cooperate by

asking Immigration Officers to check that

Chinese officials have Foreign Office

authorisation before leaving this country and

/telling

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

CONFIDENTIAL

-

4

telling the Foreign Office if there are any

infringements of the system. The more

obvious they make their checking, the more

effective the deterrent is likely to be.

6. Your agreement to the above requests

would meet our most urgent needs but I think

that we should also agree on certain further

action to be taken, for example if the

Chinese retaliated more strongly against the

Reuters correspondent in Peking by imprisoning

him on a trumped up charge or expelling him

from China after subjection to humiliation

or maltreatment. If this happened I think

we should be under strong parliamentary and

public pressure to take positive and immediate

action against the N.C.N.A. in London by

expelling all their expatriate staff. I

believe this could be fully justified as

"conducive to the public good" and indeed

that it would not be understood if we had

to admit that we had power to take such

action but were unwilling to use it. I very

Buch hope therefore that you will feel able

to reconsider your position and to agree

in principle that firm action will be taken

if the need arises.

مجھے

198

FONELATIAL

14 August, 1967

RECEIVED IN ¦ARCHIV-5 No.31

1 5 AUG 1967

F23/20

Before he left for Norway this morning. the Foreign Secretary approved
the enclosed minute to the Home Secretary about retaliatory action
against the Chinese in this country. Te were unable to get this minute
signed by

Mr. Brown before his departure. I am therefore

sending it to him unsigned with the assurance

모든

that it has the Foreign Secretary's approval.

D. 2. J. Dowler, Esq.,

Home Office.

(D. M. Day)

Private

Secretary

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTI AL

{ RECEIVED IN

HARCHIVES No.31

15 AUG 1967

جال

36

Mr de ka there 19/8

تقامة

F23/20 Date

た3720

Secretary of State

Retaliation against the Chinese

in Britain

e

раке

The submission and minutes below refer

to a Foreign Office system of exit visas for

Chinese officials in Britain. This proposal

is set out more fully in paragraph 5 of the

Fay draft minute to the Home Secretary below.

Despite the Home Office's hesitation about

this proposal, the department feel that such

a system could be made to work. If the

Chinese try to disregard the system, which

would be introduced by means of a note to the

Chinese Office, the "diplomatic action"

referred to in the minute to the Home secretary

could, for instance, take the form of a threat

to declare a member of the legation persona non

grata. The Home Office's reations to this

idea at official level are to be found at

paragraphs 7 and 8 of the record at flag D.

محمد

Dimorgonen

(D.I. Morphet) 11 August. 1967.

CONFIDENTIAL

مساء

SECRETARY OF STATE

CONFIDENTIAL

325

RECEIVED IN ARCHIVES No.31

15 AUG 1967

F23/20

I have been discussing with officials what action

we can take in retaliation against Chinese nationals

in this country bearing in mind the position of

the Reuters man in Peking and the possibility of further

harassment, for example, of business men, technicians

and ships' crews.

2. On the wider issues discussion is continuing

with, amongst others, the Board of Trade.

One

question is whether travel restrictions should be

placed on the Chinese Commercial office and members

of trading corporations. For the present, however,

we should pursue the problem of the New China News

Agency in the light of the Home Secretary's minute

to you.

3. It seems clear that the Home Secretary will

not agree at the moment to turning out the

N.C.N.A. lock, stock and barrel.

Since his minute

/to you

2

to you, he has confirmed this in private

conversation.

I suggest, however, that we keep

up the pressure in anticipation or a situation

arising when there may be a public demand for drastic

action.

4.

Meanwhile, three other possibilities are open.

First, the Home office can refuse to renew the

residence permits of members of the N.C.N.A.

Second, the Home Office can refuse re-entry visas

for members of the N.C.N.A. leaving the country

Third, the Home Urfice can refuse

temporarily.

visas for newcomers.

5. I doubt whether we can budge the Home Secretary

on the first of these (although delay can be used

as effective harassment from time to time), but we

should go for the second and third. This would run

the N.C.N.A. down over a period. There might be

no publicity for this but we should have a

defensible position in Parliament.

6. We also propose a Foreign Office system of

weit

entry visas. We can do this on our own but

Home office co-operation would be necessary.

17.

3

7. I think it would also be wise to discover

the whereabouts and activities of the 2,500

Chinese nationals in this country. I would not

like to admit that we do not know when our own

subjects in China are exposed. Enquiries would

also alert them to our interest and represent a

mild form of harassment. However, officials are

not convinced on this and the Home Secretary might

be reluctant to set in motion the considerable

administrative action involved.

8. No firm decisions are required at the moment.

But a minute to the Home Secretary on the lines

attached will enable officials to continue their

discussions. We should then have a thorough

round-up on your return to the office after the

holiday.

WTR

William Rodgers

11 August, 1967.

Kr. de la Mare

CONFIDENTIAL

RECEIVED IN ARCHIVES No.31

15 AUG 1967

F23/201

4

Flag A

Flag B

Flag C

Flag D

Problem

Retaliation against the Chinese in Britain

The Home Secretary has replied to the Secretary of

State'a minute and the memorandum from the Department about

retaliation against the Chinese in Britain. Discussions have

also been held at official level. If progress is to be made,

a further approach to the Home Secretary will be necessary.

Recommendation

2. I recommend that the Secretary of State should send a

further minute to the Home Secretary on the lines of the

attached draft.

Background and Argument

3. The Secretary of State wrote to the Home Secretary on

19 July asking for his agreement in principle to take certain

action against the N.C.N.A. London Office if the need arose.

The Department also sent a memorandum to the Home Office on

22 July on the subject of exit visas for Chinese officials in

Britain. The Home Secretary's reply of ↑ August was, as the

Secretary of State has minuted, "not very helpful".

4. We have now held further discussions with the Home Office

at official level (see record attached). In some ways the

situation is worse than we thought. The Home Office have made

it clear that not only are they unwilling to expel members of

the N.C.N.A., but they are also unwilling to refuse to renew

residence permits (which is done on an annual basie) or even

/to

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

-2-

to refuse the automatic granting of re-entry visas if

these are applied for before the persons concerned leave

this country.

In effect, this means that the present members

of the N.C.N.A. Office can stay here for as long as they like

provided that they always apply for re-entry visas before

going on leave.

5. On other matters, such as refusing new visa applications,

delaying approval for residence permits and asking Immigration

Officers to check for exit visas, if we wish to introduce such

a system, the Home Office officials were as helpful as they

could be within the limitation imposed by the Home Secretary's

known views. They pointed out however (see paragraph 15 of

record) the considerable administrative labour involved in

obtaining details about the 2,500 non-official Chinese nationals

in this country and urged that they should not be pressed to

do so unless we contemplated asking the Home Secretary to take

action against this category of person. I see no advantage in

doing so, as it will have no effect on the actions of the

Chinese Government towards British subjects in China, and in

any case the Home Secretary would clearly be even more dis-

inclined to use his powers against such persons than against

official Chinese.

6.

We have told the Home Office at official level that we

will probably wish to return to the charge about agreement in

principle to expel members of the N.C.N.A. and to obtain the

agreement of the Home Secretary for the other action which we

/wish

CONFIDENTIAL

+

CONFIDENTIAL

- 3 -

wish to take immediately.

To confirm undertakings at

official level and to press the Home Secretary for a

change of position on N.C.N.A. and co-operation over exit

vises, a further minute from the Secretary of State to

the Home Secretary is clearly desirable.

7. There are various other measures which we wish to

consider taking against the Chinese in this country which

do not, at this stage, involve the Home Office.

these is proceeding separately.

Action on

Jam Denson

(J. B. Denson) 10 August, 1967

ŵf. de lurkan

10/8

Saa Mr Rodgers' minuta below.

бы

CONFIDENTIAL

"

Fes/20

GOKFILESTIAL

33

FOREIGN OFFICE, 8.W.1.

23 August, 1967.

I attach a list of the Chinese et present in London, who are travelling
en diplomatic er official passports. This list was produced at great
speed and I am told that there my possibly be one or two people missing
from it. This will be shocked and a revised list sent to you if
necessary.

2. I understand that the Home Office has agreed to circulate this list
to all the necessary Immigration Officers and to ask them to ensure that
all those on this list have exit permits issued by the Foreign Office
before leaving this country.

8. L. I. Burley Eng.,

Home Office,

(D. C. Wilson)

For Matern Department

Princetom Henso,

271-7 High Holborn,

F.C.1.

COFFIDENTIAL

1.

SECRET

Chinese Diplomatic Mission

49 Portland Place, W.1.

SHEN PING 3088/1627

VÀ CHIA CHI

Counsellor

Counsellor

D 000534

D 000536

7456/1367/7486

TSAO LI

Wife of MA CHIA CHUN

D 000537

2580/5408

CHAO TSE KON 6392/3419/3046

2nd

(Press)

D 001165

CHEN SZU CHUN 7115/1835/5028

CHENG YUEH 6774/6885

HSIER CHT KEI 6200/0796/5019

KU HSIN (F) 7357/2450

Attaoh (Consular)

D 000550

3rd/Sec. (Cultural)

D 005743

3rd Dec.

D 000544

Wife of WU HSIN AN

D 002113

1st Seó. (Returned

to Peking on 11.7.67.)

LI HUI TING 2621/2585/1016

Puretionary

S 007185

LI TIEN CHANG 2621/3013/2490

Clerk (Press)

S 000143

LIU CHING HSUEH

Clerk

8 013863

0491/2417/1331

LIU JU TSAT

Clark

S 000158

0491/3067/2088

LU TSUNG MIN

Clerk

S 000144

0712/5115/2404

LUNG TSENG TIEN

Clerk

S 002090

7893/1073/3944

MENG HSIEN YING (7) Clérk

1322/2009/5391

SUN CHIH SHEN 1327/2535/3234

TSENG CHENG YO 2582/1987/0327

WANG CHUNG HSU 3769/1504/4872

WH

S 002354

Clerk

S 017433

Cherk

S 017452

Clark

S 002169

YANG TE SHUAN 2799/1795/0356

Coble

S 017220

YU SHEN CHIN

Driver

S 013843

0060/1957/1807

SECRET

2.

SECRET

Chinese Commercial Office

4-7 Gloucester Gate, N.W.1.

CHANG LUNG KEN

1728/7893/2704

CHANG PET YU (7) 1728/0160/3768

Clerk

S 000132

IN

S 000128

CHAO CHUN HAO

Clafk

S 017349

6392/0193/5399

CHIN MEI SHENG

Clerk

$ 007599

6855/2734/3932

HO WEN CHU

Clark

$ 000130

0149/2429/5282

HOU CHIN CHING

Clerk

S 007292

0186/6651/7230

HSIA YUN FU 1115/0336/6346

KITH TA TUNG 6200/1129/0681

HUANG CHIEN MO 7806/1696/6206

KO PAO CHIA 5514/0202/1367

LI HSI JUI 2621/6932/3843

LT HUNG TU 2621/1347/0956

LI I PLAQ 2621/5030/5903

LI SHENG CHANG

2621/3932/4545

LIU CHIH MING 0491/1807/2494

LU HSING PAO 7120/5281/1405

SHIH SUNG SHING 2457/2646/3932

WANG CHEN PU

3769/2182/2528

WANG CHING WU

3769/6945/2976

YIN HUI PI 1438/6540/3880

Clerk

Vlerk

Clark

/Clerk

Clark

$ 000141

Clerk/Seo.

S 007310

C1ørk

S 000134

Clark

S 009883

Driver

S 007255

S 007031

$ 015565

Functionary/ Attendant

S 007256

S 016117

Årade Attachā

S 000154

S 000151

\Functionary

3 007051

S 023795

Clark

S 000139

SECRET

SECRET

3. New China News Agency

26 Ferncroft Avenue, N.W.3

YU HANG

0060/2635

Correspondent

S 008627

LIN CHING (F) 2651/7230

Wife of YU HANG

S 008568

LI FU 2621/1381

CHING HUT CHIN (F) 2529/1920/3830

WANG TUAN SHENG 3769/4551/3932

Clerk and P operator

S 025101

Seo/Clerk and T/P operator

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.